1981 how would they fare in todays structure?
Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 11:07 am
Indeed these guys were leaders and strong-minded men. I am one who admits being a doubting Thomas and do not claim to be 1 of the 8000 who attended in 1980. The achievement that day would be the same as our current crop beating Kilkenny in next years Leinster final.
What they did was unprecedented βit had some luck, heroics and all that goes with such an achievement.
However I feel there are 2 changes, which will make it extremely difficult for Offaly to return to such heights. The back door and the 5 subs. These changes make it a 20-man game and favour the strong counties.
Kilkenny and Cork are the 2 strongest counties in hurling (over the last 50+ years). Period. This will continue. In any given game between these 2 and either Waterford, Tipperary, Limerick, Clare, Galway, Wexford or Offaly they will be favourites for the next 10+ years. If one manages to beat them they still face the possibility of meeting them again and I would only back 1 winner then.
The only light is that 2 other teams have to make it to the semi final where the big 2 might get caught (Galway last year) but the likelihood is that you will have to face the other in the final. It can happen that these 2 can be beaten in the semi-final but this will be the exception.
When we were at our peak it was generally felt that our teams had up to 3 weaker players, which could be accommodated by the team spirit and belief. The word weaker needs careful explanation β it is not a passenger but a player whose skill level does not match team mates but he does have a very important function i.e. Brendan Bermingham (who was my favourite player?)
The present structure does not allow for this and teams must have 20 players none of which could be described as weaker. We have never had this.
I do not feel we will be successful under the present structure and feel that it should be a knock out system, which will give every team the opportunity to believe that they can beat anyone else on any given day.
Hope this is understandable.
In 1981 would Galway and Offaly have got to an all-Ireland final if Cork, Kilkenny Tipp. and others got back in. Possibly, but what then about 85β?
What they did was unprecedented βit had some luck, heroics and all that goes with such an achievement.
However I feel there are 2 changes, which will make it extremely difficult for Offaly to return to such heights. The back door and the 5 subs. These changes make it a 20-man game and favour the strong counties.
Kilkenny and Cork are the 2 strongest counties in hurling (over the last 50+ years). Period. This will continue. In any given game between these 2 and either Waterford, Tipperary, Limerick, Clare, Galway, Wexford or Offaly they will be favourites for the next 10+ years. If one manages to beat them they still face the possibility of meeting them again and I would only back 1 winner then.
The only light is that 2 other teams have to make it to the semi final where the big 2 might get caught (Galway last year) but the likelihood is that you will have to face the other in the final. It can happen that these 2 can be beaten in the semi-final but this will be the exception.
When we were at our peak it was generally felt that our teams had up to 3 weaker players, which could be accommodated by the team spirit and belief. The word weaker needs careful explanation β it is not a passenger but a player whose skill level does not match team mates but he does have a very important function i.e. Brendan Bermingham (who was my favourite player?)
The present structure does not allow for this and teams must have 20 players none of which could be described as weaker. We have never had this.
I do not feel we will be successful under the present structure and feel that it should be a knock out system, which will give every team the opportunity to believe that they can beat anyone else on any given day.
Hope this is understandable.
In 1981 would Galway and Offaly have got to an all-Ireland final if Cork, Kilkenny Tipp. and others got back in. Possibly, but what then about 85β?