In a world where this was the last year of GAA activity, and we were folding up the association this Christmas, then this would make sense.joe123 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 11:04 am
60 hour rule means they can't play in all matches.. if u20s reach the Leinster final and they play in that it would rule them out of the 2 senior games.. I'm confused I don't really see the problem.. they aren't being deprived of anything, they will be playing Leinster senior championship a higher level which is their ultimate goal and what any player with any ambition wants.. if u20s reach a semi final on the 14th and the senior lads play that game it would rule them out of the senior match against wexford.. that simply cannot happen.. the simple solution is they play senior, look after the senior team and get the best team and players out and the u20 team will look after itself. Does anyone genuinely think we should play senior match v Wexford and Antrim without the u20 lads?
However there is a longer term view to be had here, which is that:
(1) You're right, playing Leinster Senior Championship is the ultimate goal. It's also something that barring injury, will be available to these lads for the next 10-12 years, at least. They've only one more year of U-20.
(2) The value to Offaly GAA of the type of occasions we've seen with these young players over the past three years is immeasurable. Every game that young kids get to watch where Offaly are competitive, or better yet win games, against elite counties, cements their love of the game in a different type of way. Yes we'll send coaches into schools and we'll try to keep a vibrant club scene going and all that stuff, but this will give us the kind of boost that kids in other similar counties never get. More than this, because the whole county goes bananas for it, we get far more long-term benefit out of these underage wins than bigger counties would.
I'll be honest, a line like this makes me think you're just trolling at this stage. I don't know you from Adam, I don't know if you're a club player, club coach, club officer, or simply a supporter. Either way, you're entitled to your opinion, and I'll take it at face value. But you've had this spelled out to you so many times and it's one thing to disagree with it, but to continue to let on to be confused means you're either not reading any of the replies, or else you're being deliberately obtuse about it... I'm confused I don't really see the problem..
For now, all we're talking about are the upcoming games against Waterford, where you are quite literally the only one on this board who thinks that these dead rubber matches should be prioritised over the U-20 matches against Galway and Laois.Does anyone genuinely think we should play senior match v Wexford and Antrim without the u20 lads?
As regards the Wexford match, a lot depends on the lie of the land when we get that far. It's not as simple as being a binary option, either the U-20s play or they don't. If we come into that game with one or two positive results from the first two matches and the possibility of getting into the top three is on the table, then the conversation is very different to a scenario where we've lost to Dublin, Galway and Kilkenny, and it's all going to boil down to how we fare against Antrim in OCP.
More than likely, Antrim at home will be the biggest game we play all year. It's hard to see either team being three points ahead of the other by then, so that will be a straight relegation playoff, in which case it's all out, leave nothing behind.
Even by then however, I'd say it'll just be a case - for both seniors and U-20s - of put out their best team, mind the lads in between, and where possible, restrict minutes of the lads playing both, but accepting that this might not be possible at all.