first_touch wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2024 2:07 pm
There is no chance of Carol Nolan going into government or supporting the next so called government. Equally there is no way that the FF-FG party will ask her.
There isn't a single independent that was elected that doesn't come with some sort of baggage, in one form or another. If FF/FG look to shore up their majority with independents, then 100% she will be asked. I have no idea what she'll answer, but it's not as if dealing with the Healy Raes, or buying off Michael Lowry or Boxer Moran, will be plain sailing either, and I can promise you that Micheál Martin will work very hard to bring Carol Nolan on board if it saves him having to pick up the phone to Brian Stanley, Catherine Connolly or Charles Ward.
first_touch wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2024 2:07 pm
FF-FG have plenty of independents chomping at the bit who will have no problem supporting the business as usual agenda in return for some benefits, real or perceived, for their own constituencies. There is an important role for opposition deputies who see the bigger picture and call out government policy while supporting their constituents in protecting themselves against the fallout from such policies (eg the proposed Lemanaghan wind farm).
This is the nub of the point. If Carol Nolan goes into opposition, she's free to "call out" everything and anything, but no-one will play a blind bit of heed to her. It's easy, it's safe, and it'll have no effect on government policy, and no effect on our lives here in Offaly either.
If Carol Nolan were to go into government, she could - for example - decide that her support for the government is contingent on wind farms only going into areas where there is local support, demonstrated in the form of a plebiscite of all local residents living within a certain radius. If Airtricity/Bord na Móna/Orsted want to get a wind farm across the line, they'll have to do a hell of a lot more than just put in a few cycleways from nowhere to nowhere, or maybe sponsor a few sets of jerseys. They'd have to give the community something real and meaningful instead.
Now that would be politically popular, and I have no doubt that if she wasn't asking for something unreasonable on top of this, it would be granted to her in a heartbeat. Tony McCormack and John Clendennen would love nothing more than to be seen to be behind this too.
The problem (for Carol, I stress) is that if she was to try and achieve something tangible and meaningful like this, she would then lose her freedom to also rail against anything and everything at the same time, and to always take the populist line.
And anyway, you acknowledge there there will be real (as well as perceived, in your view) benefits for the constituents of the independents that support the government. Who WOULDN'T want Offaly to benefit from that?? I mean, I didn't vote for FF/FG myself, but let's not pretend that supporting them is like supporting Netanyahu or Trump. I don't share their priorities, but they're not evil. They've been elected with 86 out of 174 TDs, the public has spoken.
first_touch wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2024 2:07 pm
I would like to have seen her raise the issue of the alarming increase in deaths in Offaly (and nationally) since the start of 2021. Hopefully she or someone else in Opposition will start making noise about it as it cannot continue to be ignored and covered up. The silence among politicians and media on the matter is deafening. It's extremely unlikely to be raised by anyone entering talks on the programme for government.
This is normally the kind of thing that would make me roll my eyes and tune out, however you are a longstanding poster on this board, you use a publicly viewable email address with your name in it, an email which is out in the public domain and makes it very easy to know exactly who you are, and so you aren't saying this from behind a veil of anonymity. I respect that, and I will treat this bit as if it's spoken earnestly and honestly, even though there are alarm bells ringing all around it.
These are the international death statistics, and the numbers are verifiable with the data available from the CSO. No red flags here.
https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metr ... death-rate
Now I assume you're referring to the Eurostat "excess mortality" statistic, which has been raised frequently on Gript, and is the one where Ireland - alongside Germany and the Netherlands - has higher levels of increased mortality rates compared to the benchmark period, which is 2016 to 2019.
For those unaware, source here -
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistic ... statistics
Now this stat is a positive number for most countries, due to Covid-related deaths that didn't exist in the benchmark period. It's worth noting here that Covid remains the second highest cause of mortality in Ireland in 2024, behind only heart failure. Though your use of quotation marks when you spoke about Covid earlier in this thread (see below) make me suspicious of your stance here, but anyway.
This became glaringly obvious during the 'covid' drama where all parties and most independents supported crazy lockdown policies, enforced mask wearing
Anyway, moving on, we have low death rates by historic measures, low rates by comparative measures (bottom handful in the EU), and when this "excess mortality" statistic WAS brought up in the Dáil - despite your incorrect assertion of silence from politicians - it was in the form of a parliamentary question from Peadar Tóibín, and was fielded by the then Minister for Health, Stephen Donnelly. The answer in a nutshell was that Ireland was slower to have the same 'ageing population' effect that has afflicted the rest of the Western World, but that there was a noticeable increase in the age profile of our population through the middle part of the last decade, and that's feeding through to (very fractionally) higher death rates now.
Just to use very simple stats to illustrate this, Ireland's overall population increased by 8.1% between 2016 and 2022, according to census data from those two years. Meanwhile, the population of people aged 85 or older increased by 25% in the same period, which is over three times as high an increase. You don't have to be a statistician or a doctor to see that advances in medical technology aren't going to be able to balance out that sort of demographic shift, and of course our 2022 population will have higher death rates.
That's why you don't see it in the mainstream media, outside of head-the-balls like Gript. When you have even a basic grasp on statistics, correlation and cause-and-effect, you can tell that there's nothing to see here. Gript don't care about things like that, because they have their own agenda.
Unless there is different data you're referring to here? Please link to it if so.
Kevin Egan. Signed out of respect for players and all involved with Offaly.