Re: Offaly Senior Football Club Championship 2011
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 1:31 pm
As the dust settles on the County Semi-Finals, it's clear that over the two games one team under-performed while another found that elusive thing called "form", which for the best part of a year seemed to have deserted them. In 12 months, Gracefield have transformed themselves from a relegation-threatened outfit into a team that was good enough to top their group and to enter a County Semi-Final unbeaten. Still, despite this great progress, they'll be very disappointed with their return yesterday. Only 3 points over the hour is not a fair representation of their share of the ball or even the amount of ball they managed to get into their forward-line. Edenderry were tough and they ground them out slowly, until the end result was inevitable. In a game where scores were very hard to come by, Edenderry's 0-10 - 0-3 winning margin was impressive. Like Gracefield, Edenderry's improvement this year is off-the-scale. They're young, fearless and play very much as a team. They also have a strong management team who seem to be making all the right tactical calls. Their form and confidence continues in an upward trend across the graph.
The second semi-final saw Clara perform like they haven't done all year. With the full panel available and fit for really only the first time this year, they did look strong. While Rhode managed to pretty much pull together their panel from last year for the majority of this campaign, injuries, J1s and other factors had an attritional effect on the Clara panel. At times, during the group stages, they were very much in the trenches, digging-out a draw against Walsh Island and allowing St. Rynaghs to grab a late draw also. With a stronger bench for the Pollagh game, there were hints that things were improving for Clara, but facing Rhode is a very different prospect, and I myself wondered whether Clara could get back to that level so quickly.
As others have already written, Clara outplayed Rhode in every part of the field. The tactics were spot-on too. Every one of the Clara forwards scored, the middle of the field was decisively won and defensively, the Clara backs were vigilant, playing as traditional backs, minding their positions and seldom roving up the field. This was the tactic that ultimately closed the space in front of Niall McNamee. When that outlet was closed, Rhode did lack ideas. I questioned two things after last years County Final:
a) What Rhode would do if Niall had a bad day at the office
b) Who the replacements would be for some of the great Rhode players that have been around for a long time (i.e. Roy, Paschal)
a) Niall McNamee has become something of a double-edged sword for Rhode (as he probably would for any club). He's so good that you can't help but look for him. The flip-side to this is if he does have a bad day (rare) or if he's tactically negated (something that is always possible), nobody really knows what to do. At times yesterday, as if on auto-pilot, Rhode played the ball into Niall's corner when he wasn't even there. In a simple exercise to quell my intrigue, I considered the last two Clara-Rhode games and what the score could've looked like without his influence. In both last years County Final and yesterdays match, I have Rhode down for 4-5 scores without his influence.
b) I'm not suggesting any of the Rhode players are finished - they're not. But some are not as influential as they once were - that's natural with age. Finding guys to replace them is never going to be easy, because they're not average footballers. Anyway, my point is this, Rhode had no real replacements yesterday and I'm not sure if they've had them for some time now. The McPaddens may turn out to be good Senior footballers, but they're young and light and probably won't become go-to footballers for some time.
Clara winning this match as they did, challenges the theorists who've marked them down as an inferior team to Rhode. Although we were treated to two closely fought county finals (with an aggregate level score), there was some contention that Rhode were a vastly superior outfit. I've always felt that these are two very evenly matched teams. Over four championship encounters across 6 years, Clara shade matters by a mere 3 points, with both teams winning twice.
Despite yesterdays emphatic win, my opinion on the two teams remains the same - they're very evenly matched. I do believe Clara have a stronger panel and also believe they shade it man-for-man, but I'll accept I have a biased view. On any given day, I think either could win, based on tactics, luck and a multitude of conditions.
Anyway, to conclude, two important points:
i) This is not a day for dancing on Rhode's grave. They're going nowhere and will be back next year, motivated in no small measure, by yesterday.
ii) Yesterday's result will be a hollow victory for Clara if they don't win the Dowling Cup
The second semi-final saw Clara perform like they haven't done all year. With the full panel available and fit for really only the first time this year, they did look strong. While Rhode managed to pretty much pull together their panel from last year for the majority of this campaign, injuries, J1s and other factors had an attritional effect on the Clara panel. At times, during the group stages, they were very much in the trenches, digging-out a draw against Walsh Island and allowing St. Rynaghs to grab a late draw also. With a stronger bench for the Pollagh game, there were hints that things were improving for Clara, but facing Rhode is a very different prospect, and I myself wondered whether Clara could get back to that level so quickly.
As others have already written, Clara outplayed Rhode in every part of the field. The tactics were spot-on too. Every one of the Clara forwards scored, the middle of the field was decisively won and defensively, the Clara backs were vigilant, playing as traditional backs, minding their positions and seldom roving up the field. This was the tactic that ultimately closed the space in front of Niall McNamee. When that outlet was closed, Rhode did lack ideas. I questioned two things after last years County Final:
a) What Rhode would do if Niall had a bad day at the office
b) Who the replacements would be for some of the great Rhode players that have been around for a long time (i.e. Roy, Paschal)
a) Niall McNamee has become something of a double-edged sword for Rhode (as he probably would for any club). He's so good that you can't help but look for him. The flip-side to this is if he does have a bad day (rare) or if he's tactically negated (something that is always possible), nobody really knows what to do. At times yesterday, as if on auto-pilot, Rhode played the ball into Niall's corner when he wasn't even there. In a simple exercise to quell my intrigue, I considered the last two Clara-Rhode games and what the score could've looked like without his influence. In both last years County Final and yesterdays match, I have Rhode down for 4-5 scores without his influence.
b) I'm not suggesting any of the Rhode players are finished - they're not. But some are not as influential as they once were - that's natural with age. Finding guys to replace them is never going to be easy, because they're not average footballers. Anyway, my point is this, Rhode had no real replacements yesterday and I'm not sure if they've had them for some time now. The McPaddens may turn out to be good Senior footballers, but they're young and light and probably won't become go-to footballers for some time.
Clara winning this match as they did, challenges the theorists who've marked them down as an inferior team to Rhode. Although we were treated to two closely fought county finals (with an aggregate level score), there was some contention that Rhode were a vastly superior outfit. I've always felt that these are two very evenly matched teams. Over four championship encounters across 6 years, Clara shade matters by a mere 3 points, with both teams winning twice.
Despite yesterdays emphatic win, my opinion on the two teams remains the same - they're very evenly matched. I do believe Clara have a stronger panel and also believe they shade it man-for-man, but I'll accept I have a biased view. On any given day, I think either could win, based on tactics, luck and a multitude of conditions.
Anyway, to conclude, two important points:
i) This is not a day for dancing on Rhode's grave. They're going nowhere and will be back next year, motivated in no small measure, by yesterday.
ii) Yesterday's result will be a hollow victory for Clara if they don't win the Dowling Cup