Agree on the dual point. Tullamore are just that bit more well drilled which stems from training. Ferbane/Belmont lads only have half the time to work on the same things Tullamore do.Wingbackassassin wrote: ↑Tue Oct 28, 2025 8:42 pm Not sure how Ferbane will recover from losing three finals in a row. Being a proper dual club and having several of their best footballers being county hurlers, makes it very difficult to beat a Tullamore team who are much more focused on football. Tullamore didn't play particularly well once again but got the scores at the critical stages almost effortlessly.
Ferbanes best chance to win was 2024.
Tullamores age profile is also a lot younger than Ferbanes. McDaid, Egan, Furlongs, Bourke all aged 22 or younger.
I know Ferbane have had excellent minor teams the past few years but even with them on board it's hard to see Ferbane being any stronger next year.
You can see it most starkly in their buildup play. Tullamore are much more patient and willing to wait for a gap to appear before striking clinically whereas Ferbane are a bit more haphazard and panicky on the ball which often leads to wayward passes or players running into blind alleys and getting bottled up.
Had Ferbane been a football only club, I’d have no doubt they’d have won 2 or 3 more Dowling Cups over the last few years.
Since 2016, they’ve lost 5 finals and 4 semi finals (2 of which were on penalties to the eventual winners) meanwhile Belmont have lost 6 semi finals in the same period.
I don’t agree on the age profile though. Dunican, Taffe, Carroll, Grennan and Wren who would’ve started barring injury are all under 22. 12/15 of the starting team are 26 or under with only one above the age of 30 (Cahill)
There are a couple of good minors from the back to back winning teams to add into that group as well as one or two who could return from travel.
They’ll go close again next year. A new manager might be the difference.