www.uibhfhaili.com

I'll answer in a meaninful ful way. Can I still take that 50/1?

First of all I apologise over the last post. It was rather childish. Anyway to answer your post.

(1) I'm not choosing to ignore anything. Is it not a fact that under the rule it states that the injured player must replace the temp ...

LS,

You really haven't a clue what your talking about. To be fair you're last few posts are a contradiction. No wonder we're called squirrel eating biffo's.

Cop yourself on!

Lets look at it from Kildares point of view for a minute. They were on the end of a bad decision against Sligo a few years ago. If I were them I'd be mightily pi$$ed off that we received NO sanction. If the Leinster Council fined us surely it would make them look somewhat competent. I'm only trying ...

As far as I am aware (correct me if I'm wrong) that the blood sub has to be replaced by the player he came on for. That did not happen in this case and tbh I was expecting a fine from the Leinster Council. Understandably Kildare are aggrieved that NO sanction was brought against Offaly in this case ...

We got away with it. We should have at least gotten a fine for our faux pas.

And of course Kildare are entitled to object. We did in '98 when we sat on the pitch in Croker.